Philips India - Labor Problems at Salt Lake

            

Details


Themes: HR Problems
Period : 1992-2000
Organization :Philips India Videocon
Pub Date : 2002
Countries : India
Industry : Consumer Goods & Services

Buy Now


Case Code : HROB004
Case Length : 05 Pages
Price: Rs. 200;

Philips India - Labor Problems at Salt Lake | Case Study


ICMR regularly updates the list of free cases. To view more free cases, please visit our site at frequent intervals.


<< Previous

The unions approached the company with an offer of Rs 100 million in an attempt to outbid Videocon. They claimed that they could pay the amount from their provident funds, cooperative savings and personal savings. But PIL rejected this offer claiming that it was legally bound to sell to Videocon and if the offer fell through, then the union’s offer would be considered along with other interested parties. PIL said that it would not let the workers use the Philips brand and that the workers could not sell the CTVs without it. Moreover the workers were taking a great risk by using their savings to buy out the plant. Countering this, the workers said that they did not trust Videocon to be a good employer and that it might not be able to pay their wages. They followed it up with proofs of Videocon's failure to make payments in time during the course of its transactions with Philips. In view of the rejection of its offer by the management, the union stated in its letter that one of its objection to the sale was that the objects clause in the memorandum of association of Kitchen Appliances did not contain any reference to production of CTVs. This makes it incompetent to enter into the deal. The union also pointed out that the deal which was signed by Ramachandran should have been signed by at least two responsible officials of the company.

As regards their financial capability to buy out the firm, the union firmly maintained that it had contacts with reputed and capable businessmen who were willing to help them. In the last week of December 1998, employees of PIL spoke to several domestic and multinational CTV makers for a joint venture to run the Salt Lake unit. Kiron Mehta said, "We can always enter into an agreement with a third party. It can be a partnership firm or a joint venture. All options are open. We have already started dialogues with a number of domestic and multinational TV producers." It was added that the union had also talked to several former PIL directors and employees who they felt could run the plant and were willing to lend a helping hand. Clarifying the point that the employees did not intend to takeover the plant, Mehta said, "If Philips India wants to run the unit again, then we will certainly withdraw the proposal. Do not think that we are intending to take over the plant."

Next >>